TY - JOUR AU - І.О. Костицька PY - 2020/03/30 Y2 - 2024/03/29 TI - ПРО НЕОБХІДНІСТЬ НАУКОВО-ТЕОРЕТИЧНОГО ОБГРУНТУВАННЯ КОНСТИТУЦІЙНО-ПРАВОВОЇ МОДЕЛІ ЮРИДИЧНОЇ ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНОСТІ ДЕПУТАТІВ JF - Scientific notes of Lviv University of Business and Law JA - snlubl VL - 24 IS - 0 SE - Series: Law DO - UR - https://nzlubp.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/249 AB - The article explores a topical issue, a research of the challenges relating to legal responsibility of Members of Parliament in the context of socially responsible government. The author considers the need for constitutional institutionalization of the responsibility of parliamentarians among the most important problems. Analyzing the coverage of this issue in the legal literature it is concluded that it is necessary to study the experience gained in different countries of constitutional and legal regulation, in particular in this area of public relations, and statutory regulation in general. On the grounds highlighting the institute of legal responsibility in contemporary literature, it is noted that today it has become clear how pressing the issue of such experience generalization, which suggests the separation of appropriate models of constitutional regulation of legal responsibility of parliamentarians, considered as an indicator of parliamentarism development, development level of theory and practice of constitutionalism, the state of development of the deter and counter system in the mechanism of power-sharing and the efficiency of responsible representative government and an indicator of democratic state-based legal regime, equality for all before the law and the reality of the phenomenon of legal responsibility of the state and parliament towards society and human. The author emphasizes that the constitutional model of legal responsibility of parliamentarians should be based on the principles of both the general theory of law and the theory of constitutional law, the need to take into account the whole hierarchy of constitutional values, and the formal logical conditionality of the model of legal responsibility of a parliamentarian and general constitutional model of state responsibility. It is argued that the differentiation at the constitutional level of responsibility of parliamentarians is determined by the specific implementation of the concept of power-sharing, the specifics of the place of parliament as the legislative power bearer in the mechanism of state power, and the analysis of the constitutional legislation of EU countries regulating the institution of legal responsibility of parliamentarians is based mainly on the joint constitutional and legal heritage of Europe. ER -